Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-11-24-Speech-3-272"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-11-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:A new Energy Strategy for Europe 2011 - 2020 (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"el"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101124.19.3-272"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-11-24-Speech-3-2732
lpv:speaker	lp:Niki Tzavela2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2010-09-21--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Israel (2009-09-16--2012-03-13)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Popular Orthodox Rally - G. Karatzaferis (2009-07-14--2014-02-24)3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 (2010-06-17--2011-06-30)3 vice-chair_member_of_the_bureau; EFD (2010-02-16--2012-01-26)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2012-03-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2012-01-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries (2009-09-16--2012-03-12)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I should like to congratulate Mrs Kolarska-Bobińska on her excellent and very hard work. As we have heard a lot of ambitious targets here – and my honourable friend Mr Turmes referred repeatedly to application – I think we should all congratulate the Commission on the recent communication which it issued in November on energy strategy issues. This is the first realistic strategy we have seen. The Commission refers specifically and clearly to the difficulties; it defines them and suggests what the difficulties are and where there is a margin for us to implement the targets we have set. Commissioner, as you have put a realistic strategic energy policy before us, and I truly welcome that, I should like to propose a practical and realistic solution to the south stream. We have two small pipelines: the ITGI and the TAP. They are ready, they are up to speed. You can move forward. Nabucco is big and it is therefore complicated and there may be delays. Move forward, therefore, with the two small pipelines."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph