Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-11-24-Speech-3-221"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-11-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101124.15.3-221"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-11-24-Speech-3-9432
lpv:speaker	lp:Robert Goebbels2
lpv:spokenAs	member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; ECON (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Special Committee on the Financial, Economic and Social Crisis (2009-10-08--2011-07-31)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the countries of Southeast Asia and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) (2009-09-30--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 (2010-06-17--2011-06-30)3 unknown; Parti ouvrier socialiste luxembourgeois (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"I abstained on the Evans report on the restriction of the use of certain hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment because I find Parliament’s approach strange. On the one hand, the report relentlessly opposes, without any scientific proof, nanoparticles, which, because they are small, must necessarily be hazardous. On the other hand, the proposal for a directive, by claiming to want to encourage the development of renewable energy technologies, excludes wastes from solar panels. Either electrical substances are hazardous, or they are not. If the aim is to impose the ‘precautionary principle’, then it should be applied to solar technology, too."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph