Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-11-23-Speech-2-386"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-11-23"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101123.33.2-386"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-11-23-Speech-2-8042
lpv:speaker	lp:Jiří Maštálka2
lpv:spokenAs	member; JURI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 treasurer; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 member; Parliament's Bureau (2009-07-15--2012-01-16)3,3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Quaestors (2009-07-15--2012-01-16)3,3 quaestor; European Parliament (2009-07-15--2012-01-16)3,3 member; Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3
lpv:translated text	"The aims of the Stockholm Programme and its implementation plan are positive. In my opinion, one of the main reasons is the fact that the aim of the programme is to create a foundation and conditions under which EU citizens can make full use of, and enforce, their rights and freedoms. The implementation of the Stockholm Programme has, and will continue to have, its difficulties. On the one hand, there is the objective need to unify legislation (for example, in the area of the right to freedom of movement), and, on the other, there is the danger of abuse through differing interpretations of the unified legal norms. The initiative of the Stockholm Programme aimed at securing recognition of official documents by Member States can be welcomed. However, this mechanism must not come into direct conflict with the basic regulations of Member States, particularly in the area of family law. In view of the fact that family law reflects a tradition going back many years and a hard-won social consensus, it is not acceptable for Member State sovereignty in this area to be breached, albeit by well-intentioned unification schemes. Further development should be aimed at ensuring that the unified law does not lead to reduced standards in terms of the rights (civil, social, etc.) that exist in Member States at various levels. It is also necessary to ensure that the unification of regulations does not lead to the possibility of launching property claims and violating state integrity, and there must be a clear definition as to how and by whom the enforceability of unified European regulations will be ensured."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph