Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-11-23-Speech-2-212"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20101123.33.2-212"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"We voted for this report, despite disagreeing with the arguments tabled by the Commission and the rapporteur to justify extending the aid. Both of them think that the few intervention measures that still remain should be completely phased out, subjecting agriculture to the ‘free market’. Therefore, they limit themselves to stating that ‘more time is needed to facilitate the adaptation process, and to allow distillers to survive on the free market’. In contrast to the rapporteur’s position, we believe that intervention in the markets and regulation instruments should, in fact, be the rule rather than the exception.
That is the only way to guarantee a living income for farmers, especially small and medium-sized producers. Therefore, it is the only way to guarantee the future of small and medium-sized agriculture, as well as the right to produce, and each country’s right to food security and food sovereignty. Instead of an exception being made for Germany for a specific product, other countries and other products should be considered for intervention as well."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples