Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-11-22-Speech-1-052"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-11-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:ECB annual report for 2009 - Latest developments on international currency exchange rates (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101122.13.1-052"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-11-22-Speech-1-0532
lpv:speaker	lp:Elisa Ferreira2
lpv:spokenAs	member; ECON (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Special Committee on the Financial, Economic and Social Crisis (2009-11-11--2011-07-31)3 member; Special committee on the policy challenges and budgetary resources for a sustainable European Union after 2013 (2010-06-17--2011-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partido Socialista (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the Parliamentary Assembly of the Union for the Mediterranean (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, the intervention in Ireland ultimately proves that the EU should have come up with a common solution for European banks, particularly the large banks, almost before dealing with any other matter. In practice, today we are openly discussing the failure of states, yet we still do not have a clear proposal for a solution for European banks. The intervention in Greece and the way it has developed prove that Europe needs European solutions, and the solution identified thus far is principally based on bilateral aid, whereby every country is subjected to the judgment of its partners based on criteria that are neither clear nor stable. The European Central Bank (ECB) has acted as an anchor in this situation, filling some of the gaps, particularly in terms of the vulnerability of sovereign debt. Make no mistake, however: we cannot continue like this in the medium term. I would therefore like to ask the President of the ECB the following three questions. Firstly, what is the ECB’s position on a stable model for constructing a true system of solidarity between the Member States with regard to sovereign debt? We need this, and we should not refuse to face up to reality. Secondly, what were the differences, if it is possible for us to identify them, which prompted the ECB not to endorse all the recommendations of the report compiled by the task force led by Mr Van Rompuy? Thirdly, does the ECB believe that the EU can survive with the increasing divergence of growth suffered by the Member States, and without a common instrument that restores some convergence in these growth strategies?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph