Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-11-10-Speech-3-997"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20101110.15.3-997"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Is the EU truly able to receive the intelligence data arriving from the United States? The motion for a resolution on the Passenger Name Record (PNR) is welcome, since it seeks to promote an agreement between the United States and the European Union based on a balance between security and data protection. There is one point on which I feel it is inadequate. In agreement with Mrs Reding in her emphasis on a culture of reciprocity, I would like to raise the question: if we really consider it important that data exchange be reciprocal – that is, that we should not only give but also receive from the United States information relevant to the prevention of terrorism – then it is not enough simply to submit a wish list to the USA but, in practice, we need to create or name the EU body that is capable of receiving and processing the intelligence data received from the USA while, at the same time, ensuring uniform access to the information by the Member States. This problem has already come to the fore in relation to the SWIFT agreement enshrining the transfer of data on bank transactions, but it has not been resolved since that time. It would have been fortunate if the motion had emphatically drawn attention to this imminent task as well."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples