Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-10-21-Speech-4-334"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-10-21"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:North Caucasus, in particular the case of Oleg Orlov2
dcterms:Language	"lv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101021.25.4-334"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-10-21-Speech-4-3352
lpv:speaker	lp:Alexander Mirsky2
lpv:spokenAs	member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-10-07--2014-06-30)3 substitute; REGI (2009-09-07--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Belarus (2009-09-16--2013-03-19)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; - (2010-04-12--2012-01-01)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	". Thank you, Mr President. I fully support the part of the resolution which addresses the need for human rights in North Caucasus to be observed. I am very familiar with the situation in the Caucasus, as I have been there more than once. At the same time, I should like to remark that the title of ‘human rights defender’ does not give Mr Orlov the right to accuse the President of the Republic of Chechnya of murder. If Mr Orlov believes that the Sakharov prize is a mandate for injudicious assertions, he is mistaken. The European Parliament does not have to act as Orlov’s lawyer. Let Orlov prove his case in court. If not in a Russian court, then in the European Court. We do not have the right to take sides in this dispute. We must give the courts the opportunity to do their work. However, I should like to give Orlov some advice – think before you speak. Defamation is an offence. Thank you."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph