Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-10-20-Speech-3-371"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-10-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101020.21.3-371"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-10-20-Speech-3-3722
lpv:speaker	lp:Carl Schlyter2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Miljöpartiet de gröna (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; INTA (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation to the Cariforum — EU Parliamentary Committee (2010-09-08--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"We believe that well-developed statutory parental leave is of the utmost importance for every country. In the final vote, however, we did not want to vote in favour of Parliament’s legislative proposal because it went against several principles that are very important to us. Firstly, the proposal wants to introduce a mandatory six weeks’ leave just for the mother. We believe that parents themselves should be able to choose how they take their parental leave and that this proposal would be a step in the wrong direction for gender equality in Sweden. Secondly, we do not believe that it is reasonable to set the level of remuneration for parental leave at full pay. As far as Sweden is concerned, this could force a reduction in the length of parental insurance in order to finance such a costly system. We are of the opinion that the organisation of social security systems is a matter for the national parliaments."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph