Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-10-19-Speech-2-600"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20101019.24.2-600"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Madam President, I should like to thank the Commissioner for her contribution so far. She says that no new legislation is necessary, yet this conclusion is rather hasty, in my view. Let us be honest: this red sludge is not considered hazardous waste? There is no good explanation for this. What do you mean by it? Is this really enough?
Yet the directive on integrated pollution prevention and control (IPPC Directive), under which this aluminium factory falls, also requires the application of the best available techniques. These techniques include, for example, two protective walls. There was only one protective wall. Thus, there are clearly problems there, too, and so I should like the Commission to carry out a much clearer analysis of whether the legislation is really satisfactory.
Then there are the inspections. Photographs in June already showed leaks, yet national supervisory authorities said that there were no problems. Those inspections were inadequate. Is it not time that the Commission presented more ambitious proposals on European inspections so as to ensure that the national inspectors, in turn, are controlled in order to prevent this kind of disaster in future?"@en1
|
| lpv:videoURI |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples