Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-10-06-Speech-3-067"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-10-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:EU action on oil exploration and extraction in Europe (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20101006.11.3-067"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-10-06-Speech-3-0682
lpv:speaker	lp:Catherine Soullie2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EPP (2009-07-14--2011-03-23)3 substitute; SEDE (2009-07-16--2011-03-23)3 substitute; IMCO (2010-03-25--2011-03-23)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2011-03-23)3 unknown; Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (2009-07-14--2011-03-23)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Israel (2009-09-16--2011-03-23)3 member; ENVI (2009-07-16--2011-03-23)3 member; Delegation for relations with Belarus (2009-09-16--2011-03-23)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, the scale of the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is clearly such that it demands us EU political representatives to ask ourselves questions about the safety of our own oil installations. In fact, one of the keys to protecting the marine environment is to ensure that oil exploration sites are as safe as possible. Nevertheless, the idea of a moratorium on current and future oil drilling in our waters is clearly premature and inappropriate. Premature, because the outcome of the investigation into the disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is not yet known, and some preliminary conclusions confirm that it was due to a combination of behavioural, organisational and technical errors. Inappropriate because − as has been said several times − different regulations apply in the North Sea, in the Mediterranean and in the Gulf of Mexico. Is it worth pointing out here the serious economic and social consequences that a moratorium would have, not to mention how it might jeopardise our energy independence? Last week, Norway and Russia ended a 40-year dispute and a 30-year moratorium by confirming the principle of a common maritime border in the Barents Sea and the Arctic. This agreement will, in practice, result in the two countries sharing a hydrocarbon-rich area. How, then, could the EU executive at the same time plan to ask for these oil activities to be suspended and for them to voluntarily place themselves in a position of weakness from an energy and economic point of view?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph