Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-09-07-Speech-2-963"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-09-07"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"lv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100907.24.2-963"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-09-07-Speech-2-1842
lpv:speaker	lp:Alexander Mirsky2
lpv:spokenAs	member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly (2009-10-07--2014-06-30)3 substitute; REGI (2009-09-07--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Belarus (2009-09-16--2013-03-19)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; - (2010-04-12--2012-01-01)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"I abstained on the vote on immunity for our fellow Member, Viktor Uspaskich, because I do not regard immunity as a sort of ‘small change’. You either have immunity or you do not. Immunity gives Members the opportunity to do their job and protects them from possible pressure. I consider that immunity cannot be lifted without a judgment of the European Court. I am not convinced that the court in Lithuania behaved fairly, because the government and president of Lithuania have frequently alluded to the high level of corruption in Lithuania. What guarantee do we have that the judgment was reached objectively? If we decide to lift the immunity of Viktor Uspaskich today, then we must remove the concept of immunity from Parliament’s Rules of Procedure."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph