Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-05-18-Speech-2-428"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-05-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Institutional aspects of accession by the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in Kampala, Uganda (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100518.32.2-428"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-05-18-Speech-2-4292
lpv:speaker	lp:Ramón Jáuregui Atondo2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2009-09-16--2010-10-20)3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2010-10-20)3 member; AFCO (2009-07-16--2010-10-19)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2010-10-20)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2010-10-20)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2010-10-20)3 unknown; Partido Socialista Obrero Español (2009-07-14--2010-10-20)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2010-10-20)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I would like to express my thanks to all those who have spoken, because the vast majority of them have expressed a very favourable position regarding the accession agreement that we are going to vote on tomorrow; in fact, it has almost been unanimous. I would especially like to thank Mrs Reding for giving us the opportunity to continue working together, as there are very complex negotiations to come and I believe that Parliament needs to be very close to those negotiations. I would like to answer a few questions and clarify a few things very quickly. Accession is not a symbolic act, ladies and gentlemen: it has legal value. Some are asking what the point is, and what it adds. I will give you an example. Let us suppose that a competition for European Union staff discriminates against Hungarian lawyers, for example, for some technical reason or any reason at all. Where do the Hungarian lawyers take their complaint? To the Court of Justice of the European Union. What does accession add? The opportunity for these lawyers to take their complaint to the European Court of Human Rights if their right to equality has not been recognised by the Court of Justice of the European Union. It is a new court, it is a new opportunity for guaranteeing fundamental human rights, for example, the right to equality. It is therefore clear that this event does not make a symbolic contribution but a legal contribution. I would like to clarify two things, ladies and gentlemen. Members have expressed their desire for the negotiations not to be limited to accession to the European Convention on Human Rights, but for the protocols that the convention has been building up over the years to be incorporated, especially those that refer to the rights acknowledged by the Charter of Fundamental Rights, as that will provide equivalence between the two documents. Finally, Parliament is also calling for accession to Convention and Council of Europe bodies and authorities, because this will enable recognition of the universal human rights protection system, including the Turin European Social Charter."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph