Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-05-18-Speech-2-425"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-05-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Institutional aspects of accession by the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms - Review Conference of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court in Kampala, Uganda (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100518.32.2-425"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-05-18-Speech-2-4262
lpv:speaker	lp:Íñigo Méndez De Vigo2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; AFCO (2009-07-16--2011-12-22)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2009-07-24--2011-12-22)3 unknown; Partido Popular (2009-07-14--2011-12-22)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community (2009-09-16--2011-12-22)3 member; ECON (2009-07-16--2011-12-22)3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, I would like to clarify two things. Firstly, the articles that are in the Charter of Fundamental Rights that are also in the European Convention on Human Rights are the same and mean the same thing: Articles 52 and 53 of the Charter; there is therefore no contradiction. Secondly, the jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights is supranational. Therefore, if someone wants to apply to it due to a European Union decision or the application of Union law, they will first have to apply to the Court of Justice of the European Union for a preliminary ruling. I understand that Europhobes always want to vote against Europe, but at least out of parliamentary courtesy, they should read Mr Jáuregui’s report, which sets everything out clearly."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph