Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-05-18-Speech-2-046"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-05-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 (amendment of Decision No 573/2007/EC). Migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (amendment of Regulation (EC) No 1104/2008) - Migration from the Schengen Information System (SIS 1+) to the second generation Schengen Information System (SIS II) (amendment of Decision 2008/839/JHA) - The establishment of a joint EU resettlement programme (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100518.6.2-046"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-05-18-Speech-2-0472
lpv:speaker	lp:Ioan Enciu2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Partidul Social Democrat (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Palestinian Legislative Council (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with Canada (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3
lpv:translated text	"As rapporteur for the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the European Parliament for the SIS issue, I am going to speak about this very matter. First of all, I would like to congratulate Mr Coelho for the huge effort he has invested in this and, in particular, for the consistency he has shown in finalising these two reports. I would also like to thank Commissioner Malmström because, since she has taken up her post, the Commission has started to show some transparency. What has caused, and continues to cause, us concern is the failure to meet the deadlines for implementing SIS II. Parliament has expressed its position on several occasions on the delays, especially regarding the Commission’s inability to set a precise date for launching its operation. The fact that we do not know for sure even now whether the tests carried out have been successful or not only serves to raise serious doubts about how the project is being managed. Given that it is the European Parliament’s duty to monitor the way in which Community money is spent, the proposal to keep in reserve the funds due to be allocated to the development of SIS II during the 2011 budget year is a normal safety measure to take. Parliament must be continually consulted on and informed about the progress of the SIS II project, which cannot be compromised due to a lack of political will or management ability. It must meet current requirements, support data protection and comply with the cost/benefit principle, with its deployment taking place within the exact timeframes specified for its implementation."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph