Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-05-05-Speech-3-515"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-05-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Accession agreement of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100505.75.3-515"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-05-05-Speech-3-5172
lpv:speaker	lp:Joanna Senyszyn2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; S&D (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Sojusz Lewicy Demokratycznej (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Mexico Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-10-07--2014-06-30)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; CULT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"Europe still does not have an effective system for the protection of human rights. The European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) is the most important instrument for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe. It is of particular significance to the citizens of my country, which Right-wing governments have deprived of the ability to protect the fundamental rights guaranteed by the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights. The European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg, which upholds the Convention, has dealt with over 100 000 cases since being established. The number of cases increases significantly from year to year. In 2009, almost 60 000 complaints were submitted to the Court, which represents a growth of 20% compared to 2008. The Member States are not in a hurry to recognise the judgments of the Court. If they did this quickly and effectively, there would be a decided reduction in complaints. Accession of the Union to the ECHR will be an additional goad to encourage efficient implementation of the decisions of the Court – an institution which upholds citizens’ rights and makes it possible for them to seek justice. Conformity of legal acts with the text of the Convention will come under the supervision of the Court. In relation to this, the decisions of the Court should also find expression in EU policy. Perhaps thanks to this the Polish Right will understand, among other things, that the state should ensure confessional neutrality in state educational establishments, where presence at lessons is required regardless of religious confession (from the judgment of the Court on the case of Lautsi v Italy)."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph