Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-05-05-Speech-3-266"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20100505.69.3-266"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:spokenAs | |
| lpv:translated text |
"−
It is positive that there is a belief that ‘LFA payments must be linked to active farming of the land’ and that ‘strict and purely biophysical criteria may not be suitable’. We also see as valuable the inclusion of the geographic criterion ‘isolation’ and the statement that ‘the cumulative use of the adopted criteria might prove necessary’. However, these aspects contradict others included in the report, specifically the definition of a ‘transitional period’ for adapting to the new criteria; in other words, tacit acceptance of the new criteria proposed by the Commission. We are utterly opposed to the reflection of the new criteria in the future development of the common agricultural policy (CAP), as is also being argued there, so keeping this policy in the sphere of rural development with cofinancing; in other words, retaining another way of discriminating between countries. If implemented, the Commission’s proposal would be extremely damaging to the interests of the southern countries, particularly Portugal. That is why we are warning of the need when drawing up the CAP to correct this proposal and to demonstrate and assess the use not just of the set of biophysical criteria, but of socioeconomic ones as well, such as: GDP per capita, income per family labour unit and desertification indicators."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples