Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-04-19-Speech-1-138"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-04-19"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Community guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network (recast) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100419.19.1-138"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-04-19-Speech-1-1392
lpv:speaker	lp:Eva Lichtenberger2
lpv:spokenAs	member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 vice-chair; G/EFA (2009-07-14--2011-12-12)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Die Grünen - Die Grüne Alternative (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; JURI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, the trans-European networks are a topic which is keeping us busy in this plenary session, and which should keep us even more busy. We now have a recast, and some people – Mr Silvestris, for example – have been surprised that the Greens have put forward amendments proposing changes to the list of the trans-European networks, or what is considered to form part of this. They must not forget that what we have suggested involves a special case: namely where the Member State itself has said that this part of the trans-European networks is only a feeder and will therefore no longer be relevant for us; this famous flight path – now I am talking like Mr Stoiber; I think this is contagious, and quite dangerous – is something we do not want to build any more; one would, so to speak, have built a feeder to Munich Airport. This is the reason for our amendment, therefore. I also generally think, however, that we should apply ourselves with particular care to revising the trans-European networks, and we should consider a point which is particularly important to me. There is a study by a Dutch person – I will gladly pass it on to the Commissioner, when he is here – which, for me, is very relevant for the coming debate, and which shows that the costs of a large project – and it very often involves large projects – are, as a rule, underestimated by an average of 45%, and their benefit is always overestimated, since that is needed in order to implement the project. That means that we must completely rethink the cost estimate for trans-European projects, and I would call on you to do that. It is our responsibility to give our citizens good, clear information."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph