Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-03-25-Speech-4-275"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-03-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100325.34.4-275"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-03-25-Speech-4-9882
lpv:speaker	lp:Bruno Gollnisch2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Front national (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; NA (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; BUDG (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"If I have understood the words of this report correctly, everything or almost everything becomes a priority, which means that there is no priority. Quite simply, what is being asked for is a larger budget; in other words, more taxes for Europeans. It is true that the rapporteur’s concern to ensure that spending funded by the EU budget is not only useful but effective and that it brings genuine European added value to national policies is worthy of praise. However, to be quite honest, this should have been a constant concern over the years. On the one hand, I recall that in the last 14 or 15 years, this has not been the case, since the European Court of Auditors did not feel able to approve the execution of the annual budgets. On the other hand, I am still looking for concrete proposals in this report that will enable this objective to be achieved. In particular, I am looking for the proposals by which to put an end to programmes that are nothing but pure populism, the useless allocation of small amounts of funding, ideological propaganda and attempts to intervene more in areas in which the EU fortunately has only few powers and, above all, is ineffective."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph