Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-03-24-Speech-3-205"

Predicate	Value (sorted: none)
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; United Kingdom Independence Party (2009-07-14--2013-02-25)3
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Special Committee on the Financial, Economic and Social Crisis (2009-10-08--2011-07-31)3
lpv:spokenAs	member; EFD (2009-07-14--2011-05-22)3
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; ECON (2009-10-07--2012-01-18)3
lpv:spokenAs	member; CONT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:spokenAs	member; BUDG (2009-10-07--2012-01-18)3
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; PETI (2010-03-08--2012-01-18)3
lpv:spoken text	"Mr President, the proposed 6.5% increase on the Parliament budget for 2011 is yet another indication of how far this House has departed from the real world and the interests of its voters. How can we explain to our constituents in normal times, let alone in times of crisis, that the total cost they are paying for each one of us exceeds GBP 2 million per year? How can we tell them that if they want a high-level parliament – which some take pride in – this is the bill they have to pay? How do we explain to all those who are losing their jobs that we, the MEPs, need more staff because of the Lisbon Treaty? Or that the officeholders in this Parliament need an increase in their allowances because they work harder? The 15% of youth who are unemployed in the UK, or worse, the 45% of youth who are unemployed in Spain, will not be able to see how this increase will help them get a job. Many of them are fairly well educated. They only lack job opportunities. I, frankly, would not be able to respond if they asked this question. Can somebody explain to my voters how the fact that this Parliament has two seats, one in Brussels and one in Strasbourg, will help them pay the mortgage, feed their children and educate them, because this is a big part of the GBP 2 million cost that I spoke about before. As regards the Commission, it is all very nice to talk about noble objectives such as investing in youth and education, promoting the study of languages and fostering innovation for economic development and job creation in Europe, but the Auditors’ report gives no comfort on how European Union funds are being spent, nor do the outstanding commitments show the EU is very good at planning. No proposal for an increase in the budget should be tolerated …"@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(The President cut off the speaker)"1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Marta Andreasen,"1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"on behalf of the EFD Group."1
dcterms:Date	"2010-03-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Priorities for the 2011 budget – Section III – Commission - Budget guidelines: 2011 - other sections (debate)2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-03-24-Speech-3-2062
lpv:speaker	lp:Marta Andreasen2
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100324.16.3-205"2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph