Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-03-10-Speech-3-059"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-03-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:2008 annual report on the CFSP - The implementation of the European Security Strategy and the Common Security and Defence Policy - Non-proliferation Treaty (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100310.6.3-059"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-03-10-Speech-3-0602
lpv:speaker	lp:Michael Gahler2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2009-09-29--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Christlich Demokratische Union Deutschlands (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; TRAN (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Afghanistan (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; SEDE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 chair; Delegation for relations with the Pan-African Parliament (2009-09-29--2014-06-30)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP (2009-07-24--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2013-07-03)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, Madam Vice-President, today you are sitting on the other side. If you switch round every month, that will be fine by me. As this debate draws to a close, a number of primary evaluations have become clear. We want you to be at the head of an External Action Service in which you – as a fellow Member said earlier – wear both hats at the same time. These two hats should be the only duplication, though – duplication in the structures is not something that we need. The retention of the Community method must be ensured, not only in relation to the budget and EP supervision. To be quite clear about this, the new service must not be the exclusive toy of the Foreign Ministers, who feel insulted that they will no longer be included in the European Council. The same applies to the appointment of the staff and the filling of important positions within the service. When it comes to the Danjean report, I would like to give my full support to the line taken by the rapporteur. When it comes to the permanent operations centre, like Mr Van Orden, I have noticed that Baroness Ashton has moved on this issue since her hearing and, I must say, in the right direction, too, as I see it. You have moved from rejection to a test phase. I still believe that, if we are to operate civilian and military mission planning in a fully integrated way in the External Action Service, it makes sense to also run that service from its own operational headquarters. With regard to the proposal from the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance to establish a Directorate-General for peace-building, I would say that, in contrast to my fellow Members who sit at the left-most edge of this Chamber, I believe the entire EU project, and specifically also our foreign policy, is a unique peace-building project. On that basis, I am not sure that we should be restricting this to a single department."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph