Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-02-10-Speech-3-557"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-02-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Body scanners - Operation of intelligence services in the context of counter-terrorism strategies (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"ro"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100210.29.3-557"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-02-10-Speech-3-9422
lpv:speaker	lp:Elena Oana Antonescu2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mashreq countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Partidul Democrat-Liberal (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2009-09-16--2012-10-21)3
lpv:translated text	"Terrorism remains a high-level threat in the European Union. This is why all Member States have stepped up their efforts to improve the tools used to prevent and combat it. The adoption of the Treaty of Lisbon offers the opportunity to respond much more efficiently in every area linked, directly or indirectly, to combating terrorism. The use of body scanners is a delicate issue. I think that there are important factors which must be examined carefully before making a decision on this. They concern the scanners’ effectiveness, respect for the right to privacy, the financial impact of using them given the particularly high cost of buying them and, above all, the way in which the use of these machines affects the health of those who are screened by them. The European Commission is due to produce three studies on the use and effects of body scanners. For this reason, I believe that it is important for us to await the experts’ conclusions and closely analyse them and only then make a decision on a common position on this issue."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph