Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-02-09-Speech-2-984"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-02-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100209.10.2-984"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-02-09-Speech-2-9832
lpv:speaker	lp:Angelika Werthmann2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Liste "Dr. Martin - für Demokratie, Kontrolle, Gerechtigkeit" (2009-07-14--2010-07-13)3,3 member; BUDG (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of South Asia (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; NA (2009-07-14--2012-07-03)3,3 member; PETI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2009-09-16--2012-07-03)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr Barroso, the pragmatic reason for voting ‘yes’ to the Commission-designate is simply that the work that needs to be done can now finally be started. This will save valuable taxpayers’ money. Mr Barroso, you have shown skill in electing the Commission. Some of the Commissioners-designate are excellent. There are also some who definitely have the potential to develop. They should be given the opportunity, as they wish, to familiarise themselves with Europe’s challenges. However, there are some Commissioners-designate who leave something to be desired, do not seem to possess the specialised knowledge and seem to lack the necessary ambition to occupy the top positions in Europe. For these reasons, I have rejected the proposal for the Commission-designate made up in this way. I would like to see commissioners appointed in a much more transparent way – and I would like better qualified female commissioners to be found."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph