Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2010-01-19-Speech-2-065"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2010-01-19"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Situation in Iran (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20100119.5.2-065"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2010-01-19-Speech-2-0662
lpv:speaker	lp:Philippe Juvin2
lpv:spokenAs	member; IMCO (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 unknown; Union pour un Mouvement Populaire (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; Delegation for relations with Afghanistan (2009-09-30--2014-06-30)3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2011-03-09)3 substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Iran (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the Iranians stated that they were ready for a gradual exchange of low-enriched uranium for fuel. This kind of production has been rejected by the Group of Six, even though it was not actually all that different from the proposal that this same group had drawn up shortly beforehand. I do not at all underestimate the Iranians’ negotiating qualities, in particular, with regard to the definition of the gradual nature of the exchange they were proposing, but given the stakes, Mrs Ashton, do you not think that this refusal by the Group of Six could perhaps have been the subject of a precise European Union common position? Why did we not seize this opportunity? I would like you to voice your thoughts on this matter to us. I do admit to being very puzzled by Europe’s discretion in this debate. We have legitimacy, Europe has legitimacy. Let us use it to help reach an agreement."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph