Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-12-17-Speech-4-989"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-12-17"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20091217.16.4-989"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-12-17-Speech-4-9882
lpv:speaker	lp:Jean-Luc Mélenchon2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; AFET (2009-07-16--2011-10-04)3,3 member; DROI (2009-07-16--2010-01-17)3,3 unknown; Front de gauche pour changer d’Europe (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 substitute; CULT (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 member; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3,3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3
lpv:translated text	"The energy strand of the European Economic Recovery Plan contains some striking proposals. These include the creation of a specific 2020 fund, the increase in state requirements concerning the environmental performance of goods, and the incentive to construct energy-efficient buildings. The decommissioning of the first-generation Kozloduy nuclear power plant in Bulgaria, for its part, fulfils an urgent requirement. Just as remarkable, however, is the fact that the EU plans to provide no assistance whatsoever to a project to move us away from nuclear power. Clearly, although it is a matter of urgency, the EU is not firmly committed to making the break from maximum productivity. How could it, when it is committed to giving absolute priority to the principles of liberalism glorified by this recovery plan? That is why, on this chapter, I decided to abstain."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph