Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-12-16-Speech-3-116"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-12-16"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20091216.10.3-116"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-12-16-Speech-3-1172
lpv:speaker	lp:Ilda Figueiredo2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-chair; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2012-01-17)3,3 unknown; Coligação Democrática Unitária (PCP-PEV) (2009-07-14--2012-01-17)3,3 vice-chair; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2012-01-17)3,3 vice-chair; EMPL (2009-07-16--2012-01-17)3,3 member; FEMM (2009-07-16--2012-01-17)3,3 substitute; ITRE (2009-07-16--2012-01-17)3,3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2012-01-17)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the Mercosur countries (2009-09-16--2012-01-17)3,3
lpv:translated text	"This amending budget clearly reflects the contradictions in the European Union’s budgets. On one hand, its global values are low in comparison with the needs of the economic and social cohesion policies. On the other hand, the funds have not been spent, because the countries that were most in need of that money found it difficult to budget for the required cofinancing. Yet they rejected the proposals we tabled for reducing the cofinancing requirements, especially at a time of crisis. Such contradictions and irrationalities of Community policy only favour the richest and most developed countries and end up exacerbating social inequalities and regional disparities. That is why we voted against it. The report itself justifies our position when it stresses that ‘there are different reasons for the apparent slow-down in payments compared to the expected rhythm depending on the Member State concerned. Firstly, the current economic situation has, in some cases, caused difficulties for the provision of national cofinancing. Secondly, the fact that Rural Development implementation in 2009 shows a less dynamic profile than the relevant year of the previous programming period is explained by the late approval of certain programmes as well as, in the case of Romania and Bulgaria, a lack of sufficient previous experience in the implementation of Rural Development programmes.’"@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph