Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-12-15-Speech-2-039"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-12-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Draft general budget of the European Union for the financial year 2010 as modified by the Council (all sections) - Draft amending budget No 10/2009 of the European Union for the financial year 2009, Section III – Commission - Mobilisation of the Flexibility Instrument - Amendment to the multiannual financial framework 2007-2013: financing energy projects under the European Economic Recovery Plan (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"hu"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20091215.7.2-039"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-12-15-Speech-2-0402
lpv:speaker	lp:Zoltán Balczó2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2009-09-16--2010-05-13)3 unknown; Jobbik Magyarországért Mozgalom (2009-07-14--2010-05-13)3 member; NA (2009-07-14--2010-05-13)3 member; ITRE (2009-07-16--2010-05-13)3 substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2010-05-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the Arab Peninsula (2009-09-16--2010-05-13)3
lpv:translated text	"The European Commission is planning to divert considerable resources to two areas in the modification of the 2009 budget. One area is competitiveness, which includes the research and development framework programmes, even though this was regarded as a priority until now. If we blame the candidates in this sector, this makes reducing red tape an even more emphatic requirement. The other area is the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development, which has suffered a EUR 1.6 billion reduction. This fund is intended to be used for rural areas to retain or restore their population. Hungary is hit particularly hard by this problem. Hungarian agriculture is dominated by large holdings. They are the ones which receive the area payments, while their use of labour is fairly small. The rapporteur had some harsh words for the modification. He said that the Commission was raiding the main areas. My question is the following: why does he still support the approval of this modification?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph