Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-11-12-Speech-4-116"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-11-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote (continuation)2
dcterms:Language	"es"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20091112.17.4-116"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-11-12-Speech-4-1172
lpv:speaker	lp:Willy Meyer2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with the Maghreb countries and the Arab Maghreb Union (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 unknown; Izquierda Unida (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2009-07-14--2014-06-30)3 substitute; DROI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 vice-chair; PETI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of Central America (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3 member; AFET (2009-07-16--2011-10-04)3 substitute; LIBE (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3
lpv:translated text	"I am not opposed to the liberalisation of visas for the Western Balkan countries. However, I voted against the Fajon report because it is unacceptable to think about the liberalisation of visas with Kosovo while we do not recognise its independence. In terms of international law, Kosovo’s independence is an illegal act; therefore, the EU cannot negotiate the liberalisation of visas or any other aspect with a territory that is illegally independent. Voting for the Fajon report means indirectly recognising the independence of Kosovo, and that is not acceptable. In addition, under no circumstances can we accept requirements for biometric data for the issue of visas."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph