Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-11-11-Speech-3-294"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-11-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:‘made in’ (origin marking) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20091111.23.3-294"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-11-11-Speech-3-2952
lpv:speaker	lp:Cristiana Muscardini2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation for relations with Iraq (2009-09-16--2014-06-30)3,3 unknown; Il Popolo della Libertà (2009-07-14--2011-02-06)3,3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2009-09-16--2012-10-14)3,3 substitute; ENVI (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 vice-chair; INTA (2009-07-16--2012-01-18)3,3 member; EPP (2009-07-14--2012-10-14)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, certain problems affect us too, not just the interpreters and those who want to follow the debate and hopefully receive some concrete answers in relation to a problem that has been dragging on since 2005. As the Commissioner has rightly pointed out, for many years, our main competitors and economic partners have had origin marking for goods that enter their territory. However, the European Union, in spite of the 2005 proposal for a regulation, which was broadly supported by consumers, by categories of civil society, still lacks a definition, in spite of the favourable opinion expressed many times by Parliament. The lack of a regulation on the designation of origin of goods undermines the right of citizens and consumers and prevents the proper functioning of the market, which, to be free, must have common and shared rules. The Article 133 Committee has examined in the last few days ideas for reducing the categories of goods included in the regulation, and the grounds for recommending their application for a trial period. We ask the Commissioner: are these compromise proposals endorsed by at least some of the Member States? Will further consideration be given to them? Do you intend to continue to support the 2005 proposal for a regulation, together with Parliament and as part of the codecision procedure? What guarantees and timetables is the Commission offering at the end of this difficult and belated debate? Lastly, Commissioner, while I thank you in any case for what you have done with great energy and determination, can you confirm to me what you wrote in your reply to my question on 5 November 2009, namely that the Commission will continue strongly to support the adoption of the proposal submitted in 2005 and that it will continue to honour its commitment?"@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph