Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-05-06-Speech-3-525"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-05-06"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090506.42.3-525"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-05-06-Speech-3-5262
lpv:speaker	lp:Ewa Tomaszewska2
lpv:spokenAs	member; EMPL (2007-09-06--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2007-09-06--2009-07-13)3 member; UEN (2007-08-30--2009-07-13)3 substitute; CULT (2007-09-05--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2007-09-05--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (2007-08-30--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, the ritual slaughter of animals, which causes them extreme suffering, is inconsistent with our civilisation. I do not believe that any religion which aims to do good could require something like this from its followers. Such slaughter is, rather, a custom of savage and primitive tribes, and we should not agree to it. If religious toleration is to be used as an argument, then we should add that there are religions in the world which practice the ritual killing of people. Are we also going to agree to that? Is that our community of values? Rejection of Amendment 28 would have given at least the possibility for maintaining or introducing a ban on such practices in particular Member States. Adoption of Amendment 28 reveals the true, bloodthirsty face of this Parliament. I voted in favour of the report as a whole, but I did so only because other provisions improve the situation of animals designated for slaughter."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph