Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-05-05-Speech-2-445"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-05-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:The petitions process (amendment of Title VIII of the Rules of Procedure) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"it"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090505.30.2-445"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-05-05-Speech-2-4462
lpv:speaker	lp:Monica Frassoni2
lpv:spokenAs	member; JURI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Conference of Presidents (2006-12-13--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the Euro-Latin American Parliamentary Assembly (2007-05-23--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AFCO (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Iran (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Mercosur (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 co-chair; G/EFA (2007-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ENVI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Federazione dei Verdi (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, ladies and gentlemen, I too would like to thank Mr Onesta, also on behalf of the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance. Incidentally we were both at a party earlier and we will soon be going back to finish the thank-yous and celebrations. In this respect, I naturally wanted to say that we support this report, but that we also feel that the subject of the relationship with the primary committee remains a thorny topic in the Corbett reform and at this point I also would like to say something to Mr Botopoulos: it is not that the Committee on Petitions is a strange committee, it is a committee that has a very specific role and on most occasions petitions are concerned with the application of Community law, they are concerned with breaches of directives and laws that do not evidently always have a very clear relationship with the primary committee. I would go further, and say that anybody who has had anything to do, however little, with the work of the Committee on Petitions can see that it is a sort of ‘Cinderella’ in our Parliament. They will also see that the primary committee does not respond to the requests of the Committee on Petitions, it absolutely cannot be bothered to respond to anything that the Committee on Petitions says, does or proposes. This is my fear: my fear is the fact that the Committee on Petitions, which not always, but often, is concerned with the application of Community directives, must somehow wait for permission from the committees responsible for making the laws, which therefore have a different part to play, and must also ask the permission of the Conference of Presidents when it is a simple case of checking the application, which has nothing to do, I repeat, with the legislative function of the parliamentary committees. This is why I am expressing my concern about the reform proposed by Mr Corbett on petitions even though I agree strongly with what Mr Onesta said, and I thank you again, Vice-President, for being flexible about the time."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph