Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-03-24-Speech-2-090"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-03-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Green Paper on territorial cohesion and debate on the future reform of the cohesion policy - Regional policy best practice and obstacles to use of Structural Funds - Urban dimension of cohesion policy - Complementarities and coordination of cohesion policy with rural development measures - Implementation of the Structural Funds Regulation 2007-2013: results of negotiations on national cohesion strategies and operational programmes - A European initiative for the development of micro-credit in support of growth and employment (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090324.3.2-090"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-03-24-Speech-2-0912
lpv:speaker	lp:Zbigniew Kuźmiuk2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Polskie Stronnictwo Ludowe (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ECON (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; UEN (2005-12-13--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2007-04-25--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"In the cohesion policy debate, I should like to draw your attention to some issues raised by Mr Roszkowski’s report on the matter. 1. In the Financial Perspective 2007-2013, the European Agriculture Fund for Rural Development was made the second pillar of the CAP and was thereby separated from cohesion policy. As a result of this development, particularly in view of the slender budget funds available, cohesion policy, particularly that of the European Regional Development Fund, has focused on economic competitiveness concentrated in the larger urban centres or the most active regions, while the EAFRD is concentrating its resources on improving agricultural competitiveness. This approach may result either in the duplication of some objectives, for example environmental protection, education and culture, or their omission in both areas. 2. Therefore, we need to assess whether the funding designated for rural development in 2007-2013 should be used more to support farmers, or whether it will be assigned more to non-farming rural beneficiaries, or even beneficiaries who remain in rural areas but will move from the farming sector to other areas of professional activity. If it turns out that support for farmers is the preferred objective of the second pillar, it appears that in the next perspective it would be favourable to tie these funds in to cohesion policy. 3. It is also necessary to increase the funding pot for the second pillar of the CAP, albeit, as called for by the European Parliament, through a reduction in direct payments to large farmers, and a gradual increase in modulation rates."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph