Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-03-11-Speech-3-312"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-03-11"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:State of play of SIS II (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090311.35.3-312"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-03-11-Speech-3-3132
lpv:speaker	lp:Martine Roure2
lpv:spokenAs	vice-president; European Parliament (2007-07-10--2009-07-13)3 member; LIBE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 vice-president; Parliament's Bureau (2007-07-10--2009-07-13)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the People's Republic of China (2007-09-26--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"− Mr President, SIS II, as we know, is a very important tool for ensuring the security of the Schengen area, especially following the enlargement to include the 10 new countries. Since the adoption of the legal bases in 2007, not once have we had the opportunity to see a detailed report on the developments or on the technical or political problems that are said to be hindering the start-up of the system. It was through the press that we learnt that all the tests required to launch the central system in complete safety had failed in December 2008. We know that the Commission has tried to draw up a remedial plan to resolve the main problems, and we know that several Member States, within the Council, are already thinking of an alternative that would consist of a simple upgrade to the SIS system currently in operation. The problem is therefore not technical, but political. This Parliament has been asked to define by codecision the architecture of SIS II which, of itself, would have ensured the security necessary for our area of freedom, security and justice. We have worked on it without losing sight of security and the protection of the fundamental rights of our citizens. In this instance, it is the political responsibility of the European institutions, and of the Council and the Commission, in particular, that is at stake, for we believe that Parliament has acquitted itself well in relation to the citizens. We await, now and in the future, the political reasons for this radical change of direction. This could, of course, have very serious consequences for the budget earmarked thus far for this project, beginning with the putting aside, where necessary, of the available resources, until such time as the future of the project and its legal basis have been duly defined."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph