Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-03-10-Speech-2-995"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-03-10"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090310.28.2-995"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-03-10-Speech-2-2192
lpv:speaker	lp:Roselyne Lefrançois2
lpv:spokenAs	member; FEMM (2007-07-10--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2007-07-04--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2007-07-11--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AGRI (2007-07-10--2009-07-13)3 member; PES (2007-07-04--2009-07-13)3 member; LIBE (2007-07-10--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Right from the start, I, as shadow rapporteur for the Socialist Group in the European Parliament for this report, have had serious reservations about the usefulness and the effectiveness of the entry/exit system mentioned in the European Commission’s communication. Implementing such a system, which is directly inspired by the ‘US-VISIT’ Programme, would mean making huge investments only to see very uncertain results obtained with regard to the fight against both illegal immigration and crime. This is what the US experiment shows, in any case. Moreover, the planned measures, which are based on the massive collection of personal data, pose risks to the protection of privacy in my opinion. This view is shared by the European Data Protection Supervisor. The adoption of a number of my amendments, which were aimed at highlighting doubts concerning the need and the proportionality of the system and at criticising the culture of suspicion that increasingly pervades decisions relating to external border management, have led me to endorse the report in plenary. At a time when the global economy is plunged into crisis, there are, without doubt, other priorities for the European budget."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph