Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-02-18-Speech-3-262"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-02-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Financing of actions other than Official Development Assistance in countries falling under Regulation (EC) 1905/2006 (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"de"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090218.24.3-262"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-02-18-Speech-3-9912
lpv:speaker	lp:Angelika Beer2
lpv:spokenAs	member; AFET (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 chair; Delegation for relations with Iran (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 member; SEDE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; G/EFA (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Afghanistan (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2004-09-22--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"The review of the new foreign policy financing instruments has revealed defects in cooperation with third countries, and so we propose reforming the industrial instrument. The Committee on Foreign Affairs does not consider it desirable to limit the new legal basis for the instrument to a few areas of cooperation. In addition, the policy fields currently envisaged (culture, youth, research) are borrowed from European domestic policy and have not, up to now, been intended to define cooperation with third countries. This is just one of the uncertainties that worries the Committee on Foreign Affairs. What happens, for example, if, in the near future, it becomes desirable to cooperate with other countries in matters of climate policy? Do we have to create a new legal basis for the instrument each time? Do we mean to do that every time there is a change in the area of cooperation? The reform of the foreign policy instruments is very important to us all, and so it should be made clear that we are not fighting against one another. This is the only reason why the Group of the Greens/European Free Alliance, together with the second rapporteur from the Committee on Foreign Affairs, withdrew the amendment on Monday. In terms of content, we believe our proposal is more far-sighted and that it is the one that enables a coherent foreign policy. However, this report is just a recommendation to the Commission. We shall see what it does with it."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph