Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-02-18-Speech-3-141"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-02-18"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Annual Report (2007) on the main aspects and basic choices of the CFSP - European Security Strategy and ESDP - The role of NATO in the security architecture of the EU (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090218.20.3-141"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-02-18-Speech-3-1422
lpv:speaker	lp:Daniel Strož2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3 member; JURI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; CULT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"I fundamentally reject the report on European security strategy and a European security and defence policy in its current form (). This report is a typical example of the militarisation of the EU and proof of the fact that in the security sphere of the EU, military resources and measures have to replace and even supplant necessary measures of a political nature. Many of the findings and recommendations contained in the report are in direct conflict with the fact that the EU is supposed to be developed as a project for peace. It is no wonder that EU citizens, whenever they get a chance to express their opinion, take a stand against the Lisbon Treaty for reasons that include the way it establishes the militaristic nature of the EU. There is a highly aberrant and dangerous position included in the report which, on the one hand, talks about the security interests of the EU while, on the other, criticising Russia for defending its own perfectly legitimate security interests in the Caucasus."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph