Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-02-05-Speech-4-145"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-02-05"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090205.14.4-145"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-02-05-Speech-4-1462
lpv:speaker	lp:Nils Lundgren2
lpv:spokenAs	member; IND/DEM (2008-05-09--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; CONT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Junilistan (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"− ( ) The European Parliament’s report contains some constructive amendments, such as including on the label the fact that meat and meal is contained in certain compound feed for non-ruminants. However, the report’s amendments also include details that should be dealt with by officials at authority level and not by politicians. For example, the wording of the citable text ‘oral animal feeding: the introduction of feedingstuffs into an animal’s gastrointestinal tract through the mouth with the aim of meeting the animal’s nutritional needs and/or maintaining the productivity of normally healthy animals’, ‘licking buckets containing minerals’ or of ‘faeces, urine as well as separated digestive tract content resulting from the emptying or removal of digestive tract, irrespective of any form of treatment or admixture’. These are certainly important issues relating to food safety, but they should be left to national authority experts to take care of. I have voted in favour of the report, as it contains some proposals that are, in principle, important, but this does not mean that I support its approach in terms of its involvement in specific details."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"Nils Lundgren (IND/DEM ),"1 "SV"1 "in writing."1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph