Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2009-01-12-Speech-1-142"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2009-01-12"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Action Plan on Urban Mobility (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20090112.15.1-142"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2009-01-12-Speech-1-1432
lpv:speaker	lp:Jean Marie Beaupuy2
lpv:spokenAs	member; REGI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; EMPL (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3,3 member; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3,3 unknown; Mouvement Démocrate (2008-03-28--2009-07-13)3,3 member; ALDE (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3,3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the countries of the Andean Community (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3,3
lpv:translated text	"Madam President, Commissioner, with all due respect to your position and to you personally, Commissioner, I should like, if I may, to say two things in response to your speech. You have tried to sidestep the issue and you have done a balancing act. You have pointed out to us what the various chapters that were due to appear in this action plan were, and I believe that my fellow Members and I can only be pleased to have actually found the bulk of our proposals in this list. You have therefore furnished us with proof that, within the Commission, you possess all the elements needed to publish this action plan in all its parts. For my part I believe that there could be four explanations to account for your first sentence of part two, which says, if I have correctly understood the translation, that the conditions are not favourable. Possibility number one: is there a shortage of technical information within the Directorate-General for Transport? The particulars provided by Mr Barrot, within the context of the Green Paper, seem to suggest that, on the contrary, the Commission is very well equipped with technical information. Possibility number two: you say that the conditions are not favourable. Are some Member States opposed to this plan? As far as I know, though, Commissioner, the Commission is independent of the Member States. I do not for one second believe that you would have bowed to the pressure of certain Member States. Possibility number three: are there differences of opinion within the Commission itself that would prevent you from submitting this action plan to us? My goodness, I hope not! Lastly, are you refusing to hold the debate with the current European Parliament so as to postpone it until next year? Given the excellent reports that bolstered our relations with Vice-President Barrot during the drafting of the Green Paper, I dare not believe this. Commissioner, we are a few weeks away from the elections. This action plan is in my view an excellent example with which to demonstrate to our fellow citizens that, at the same time as it shows respect for subsidiarity, Europe is very in touch with their health problems, and so on, which you have listed. I deeply regret this delay and, like my fellow Members, I hope that you will be able to remedy it as soon as possible."@en1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph