Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-12-15-Speech-1-198"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-12-15"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Transfers of defence-related products (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20081215.17.1-198"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-12-15-Speech-1-2002
lpv:speaker	lp:Daniel Strož2
lpv:spokenAs	member; Delegation to the EU-Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3 member; JURI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Komunistická strana Čech a Moravy (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; CULT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"One of the main reasons why the great majority of EU citizens oppose the so-called Treaty of Lisbon is that it anchors and at the same time reinforces the militarisation of the EU rather than allowing the EU to develop as a purely peaceful project. It is mainly the European left that has come out strongly against the militarisation of the EU. The report on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and Council on simplifying the terms and conditions of transfers of defence-related products within the Community () is a typical example of the militarisation of the EU. Under the cloak of bland and misleading notions such as ‘defence equipment’ or the ‘European defence industry’ it has the aim of radically simplifying and strengthening the arms trade and arms manufacturing within the framework of the European Union, while presenting all of this in terms of an economic benefit for small and medium-sized companies. Arguments such as this are unacceptable in such a serious and sensitive area. The militarisation of the EU, including arms manufacturing, is a path that the EU should definitely avoid."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph