Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-10-22-Speech-3-245"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-10-22"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"sv"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20081022.17.3-245"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-10-22-Speech-3-2462
lpv:speaker	lp:Charlotte Cederschiöld2
lpv:spokenAs	member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2007-07-23--2009-07-13)3 member; IMCO (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with the United States (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Moderata Samlingspartiet (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; JURI (2007-03-12--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2007-03-29--2009-07-13)3 substitute; LIBE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"I have today chosen to abstain in the final vote on Mr Andersson’s report on challenges to collective agreements in the EU (). Collective agreements, union rights and the right to take industrial action are inscribed in the Treaty of Lisbon, which I want to see legally binding. The treaty also contains the right to work, the right to run businesses and the right to move across EU borders. Exceptions cannot, as the proposal would have happen, be made for union representatives when it comes to respect for fundamental EC legal principles, for example the principle of proportionality. It applies, and must of course apply, to all EU citizens. EC law and the treaties should have their strongest representatives in the European Parliament. The position adopted by Parliament concerning the legal basis is in danger of becoming a threat towards future freedom of movement. I am very pleased, however, that the European Parliament has adopted a position in favour of the Swedish model and our collective agreements."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph