Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-09-25-Speech-4-102"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-09-25"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Concentration and pluralism in the media in the European Union (A6-0303/2008 , Marianne Mikko) (vote)2
dcterms:Language	"hu"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080925.11.4-102"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-09-25-Speech-4-1032
lpv:speaker	lp:Pál Schmitt2
lpv:spokenAs	unknown; Fidesz-Magyar Polgári Szövetség (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with Japan (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 chair; Delegation to the EU-Croatia Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Conference of Delegation Chairs (2004-09-22--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; CULT (2007-02-01--2009-07-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-11-14--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	". Mr President, as shadow rapporteur for this topic, I would like to join those who say that this system is not good as it is. I would have liked to express the opinion of the People’s Party in the Parliamentary debate, but, as shadow rapporteur, I was not given the floor. I would like to ask why, if pluralism in the media is so important, pluralism of opinion is not so important? I would have liked to explain the fact that we do not agree on some things, but I was not given the floor. Of the whole Parliament, two people were allowed to speak on this topic; the rapporteur and the Commissioner. We absolutely must consider whether this system is good, because we are curious about each other’s opinions, and this is called pluralism of opinion. Please, Mr President, help us to bring this to fruition."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"(Applause from the right)"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph