Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-09-24-Speech-3-348"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-09-24"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Question Time (Commission)2
dcterms:Language	"en"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080924.33.3-348"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-09-24-Speech-3-3492
lpv:speaker	lp:Andris Piebalgs2
lpv:spoken text	"I would be in the 35% camp, because it is important that, if we put requirements that completely ban biofuels from the market and there is too high a risk of leverage, we will move to oil – and deeper – and perhaps to coal and liquid technology. In my opinion this is worse than really keeping 35% as the threshold, and a 35% threshold is clearly saving CO . So I will stay with 35%. It is now up to negotiations with Parliament and Council: if it comes to be a different figure, well, I will live with this figure, but I think 35% is rather tough, because in the college, when the figure was discussed, we were also in different camps, and this is already compromised from the two camps: one that believes in biofuels and one that is afraid of biofuels. So 35% was actually the compromise."@en1
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata	"2"1 "Andris Piebalgs,"1 "Member of the Commission"1
lpv:videoURI	<go to Events_and_structure europarl>2

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph