Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-07-09-Speech-3-523"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-07-09"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:European Union fishing fleet affected by the economic crisis (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pt"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080709.43.3-523"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-07-09-Speech-3-5242
lpv:speaker	lp:Paulo Casaca2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation for relations with Australia and New Zealand (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Partido Socialista (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; CONT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; PECH (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the NATO Parliamentary Assembly (2007-03-26--2008-09-02)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2007-03-16--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Iran (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 member; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, I believe that the political direction taken by this proposal, as well as its timing, are absolutely right. I think that these are appropriate measures for the situation we are experiencing in Europe’s seas. I believe that this is the right way to go. If we examine this proposal carefully, the major problem is whether it is workable or not. As the Commissioner requested urgency, Parliament has acted urgently and foregone its right to analyse and present amendments to the regulation. However, the problem is in knowing whether it is possible to implement such complex rules as these within the intended period. One clause says that plans for reduction should begin before 30 November. However, these plans to reduce the number of vessels must be formulated by Member States and some of these programmes have to be approved by the European Commission, because the financial resources for the programmes will come from the existing European Fisheries Fund. Such programmes are extremely complex and involve compulsory percentages and some of the rules are almost impenetrable, as the Commissioner has seen today with Article 19(4). This seems to me to be the major problem: will the detail of this proposal make its practical application unfeasible? If so, this would be extremely regrettable. I therefore ask the Commission, the Commissioner and all the Directorate-General officials to think very carefully about the feasibility of what is being proposed here, because if it is not feasible within the proposed period, it is not worth the effort that we are being asked to make here."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph