Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-07-08-Speech-2-352"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-07-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Conditions for access to the natural gas transmission networks - Internal market in natural gas - European strategic energy technology plan (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080708.35.2-352"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-07-08-Speech-2-3532
lpv:speaker	lp:Adam Gierek2
lpv:spokenAs	member; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2007-03-28--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ENVI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Temporary Committee on Climate Change (2007-05-10--2009-02-04)3 member; PES (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Unia Pracy (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with South Africa (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, every plan should include decisions concerning its situation both in time and in space, but the present Commission decisions are slowing down implementation of earlier plans, for example, plans for cogeneration investments are being held back by the market, as it is not worth converting heat-generation plants into efficient heat and power plants burdened by emission charges and network problems. Furthermore, the Commission has divided EU countries into the better ones, which can increase their emissions, and worse ones, which have to reduce them. These latter ones are, of course, principally the countries of Central and Eastern Europe. According to the Kyoto Protocol, the reference year for calculating emissions under the ETS should be 1990, not 2005, as has been imposed by the Commission. This would be more honest and show greater solidarity. Being a leader in the area of the questionable impact of emissions on climate change should not take place at the cost of poorer populations. Efficiency and energy reductions should, however, be priorities, while renewable energy should be a supplement rather than an alternative. In the medium term the future belongs to clean coal energy and, in the longer term, as is already clear, to nuclear energy."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph