Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-07-08-Speech-2-058"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-07-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Environmental impact of the planned gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea to link up Russia and Germany (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080708.4.2-058"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-07-08-Speech-2-0592
lpv:speaker	lp:Wojciech Roszkowski2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; CONT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AFET (2007-09-06--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Prawo i Sprawiedliwość (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; REGI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; UEN (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with Japan (2007-03-14--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation for relations with India (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"The debate on Mr Libicki’s report shows almost total unanimity in the assessment of the Nord Stream project. It is economically unsound, threatens horrendous additional costs in the future price of gas, constitutes an ecological threat to Baltic countries and also increases the dependence of some Member States on supplies from Russia. The question arises – who benefits? The voice of Mr Matsakis, who in this context spoke of opposing the report and called for ‘honesty’, can hardly be taken seriously. It is difficult to understand what Mr Matsakis understands by the concept of honesty. Voting on this report will be a test of the extent to which the European Parliament is really guided by the views of economists, ecologists and ordinary EU citizens, and how much by pressure from the Russo-German lobby, which is intent on reducing energy security and ecological safety for some Member States and on destroying EU solidarity."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph