Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-07-08-Speech-2-031"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-07-08"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Environmental impact of the planned gas pipeline in the Baltic Sea to link up Russia and Germany (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"pl"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080708.4.2-031"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-07-08-Speech-2-0322
lpv:speaker	lp:Grażyna Staniszewska2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; Delegation to the EU-Moldova Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2007-03-15--2009-07-13)3 member; REGI (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; CULT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; ALDE (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Unia Wolnosci/Partia Demokratyczna - demokraci.pl (2005-06-17--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation to the EU-Ukraine Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 substitute; PETI (2008-01-16--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"Mr President, for me the northern gas pipeline and the approach taken by the European Parliament towards the northern gas pipeline are a test of the real value of the European Union, a test of whether the EU really does act on the basis of solidarity. It is also a test of our commitment to environmental protection. If, in much smaller projects that carry considerably less risk to both humans and the environment, it is a requirement to put forward several alternative proposals so that the best one can then be selected, so in this enormous project, which, potentially, could cause a serious threat not just for the environment but also for humans, one should require the proponents to put forward several alternative proposals. It is only then that the most beneficial proposal, which is least harmful to humans and to the environment, should be selected. It is very strange that, in the case of this enormous undertaking, this approach was ignored."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph