Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-04-22-Speech-2-182"
| Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
|---|---|
| rdf:type | |
| dcterms:Date | |
| dcterms:Is Part Of | |
| dcterms:Language | |
| lpv:document identification number |
"en.20080422.46.2-182"2
|
| lpv:hasSubsequent | |
| lpv:speaker | |
| lpv:translated text |
"Police and judicial cooperation falls within the third pillar and is thus exclusively intergovernmental. The June List is in favour of increased cooperation
Member States to combat terrorism and other serious cross-border crime. Decisions in this area should therefore not be taken by the European Parliament or any other supragovernmental body.
Minimum rules on the individual’s access to legal assistance and data protection are laid down in each Member State. Fundamental and extensive protection is already in place in this respect through the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which has been signed by all Member States. A functioning exchange of DNA already exists through Interpol.
It is also important to highlight the privacy aspect which the use of DNA demands. On this point we are therefore in line with the report regarding requests for the DNA of people who have been acquitted or discharged.
The report, however, goes too far in many respects when it discusses the introduction of framework decisions in many areas such as procedural guarantees and the adoption of a general legal instrument to cover the entire area of police and judicial cooperation. It even discusses setting up joint task forces. A country’s military resources are strictly a national matter, and must not be regulated at EU level. The June List has therefore chosen to vote no to the report."@en1
|
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples