Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-03-26-Speech-3-059"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-03-26"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Results of the European Council (Brussels, 13-14 March 2008) (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"fi"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080326.4.3-059"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-03-26-Speech-3-0602
lpv:speaker	lp:Esko Seppänen2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; CONT (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 vice-chair; Delegation to the EU-Russia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee (2004-09-21--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Vasemmistoliitto (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Kazakhstan, EU-Kyrgyzstan and EU-Uzbekistan Parliamentary Cooperation Committees, and for relations with Tajikistan, Turkmenistan and Mongolia (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; EUL/NGL (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3 substitute; ITRE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; BUDG (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"The suggestion by the representative of the country holding the presidency that there was a link between the EU’s favourable economic growth and the Lisbon Strategy is not credible. The Lisbon Strategy has none of the informed criteria that would explain the reduction in budget deficits and in public indebtedness or the creation of 6.5 million new jobs. The credit for this goes to the Member States. It is in their economies that the lack of any social dimension in the Lisbon Strategy is made conspicuous. The buzzword for today is ‘flexicurity’. It means that making working conditions more flexible should be rewarded with job security. A better description of the spirit of the times, however, would be the world ‘flexinsecurity’. EU nationals are being threatened with redundancy should they not agree to enforced flexibility."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph