Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-02-20-Speech-3-078"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-02-20"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Treaty of Lisbon (debate)2
dcterms:Language	"cs"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080220.3.3-078"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-02-20-Speech-3-0792
lpv:speaker	lp:Jan Zahradil2
lpv:spokenAs	substitute; LIBE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with India (2007-03-28--2009-07-13)3 member; DEVE (2007-01-31--2009-07-13)3 member_of_the_bureau; EPP-ED (2004-08-31--2009-07-13)3 substitute; Delegation to the EU-Turkey Joint Parliamentary Committee (2004-09-15--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Občanská demokratická strana (2004-07-20--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"The European Union is not a state and so it does not need a constitution. This had to be admitted, albeit reluctantly, even by the advocates of the old European Constitution. Unfortunately, not all of them have come to terms with the disappointment, which is why we find paragraph 6 of this report expressing regret over the changes made in the new Treaty in contrast to the draft European Constitution. I consider this to be a serious mistake. After a difficult journey a consensus was reached among the 27 Member States. Some governments wanted changes to the draft European Constitution and now the report by Mr de Vigo and Mr Corbett indirectly criticises them for their approach. In my opinion, if the European Parliament votes in favour of paragraph 6 of the report, it will be expressing disrespect to the complex consensus obtained by the 27 Member States, and that could only be harmful to the whole matter. I certainly cannot support that paragraph."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph