Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-02-19-Speech-2-138"

Predicate	Value (sorted: default)
rdf:type	lpv_eu:Speech2
dcterms:Date	"2008-02-19"^^xsd:date2
dcterms:Is Part Of	lp_eu:Explanations of vote2
dcterms:Language	"fr"^^xsd:language2
lpv:document identification number	"en.20080219.26.2-138"2
lpv:hasSubsequent	lp_eu:2008-02-19-Speech-2-1392
lpv:speaker	lp:Roselyne Lefrançois2
lpv:spokenAs	member; FEMM (2007-07-10--2009-07-13)3 unknown; Parti socialiste (2007-07-04--2009-07-13)3 member; Delegation for relations with the United States (2007-07-11--2009-07-13)3 substitute; AGRI (2007-07-10--2009-07-13)3 member; PES (2007-07-04--2009-07-13)3 member; LIBE (2007-07-10--2009-07-13)3
lpv:translated text	"This report reflects substantial amendment work by the members of the PSE, Verts/ALE, GUE/NGL and ALDE Groups in the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. From a text that initially stigmatised Islam and Muslims in a quite disgraceful way, the progressive, centre-left majority managed to craft a balanced document highlighting the whole range of factors (economic, social and so on) that favour support for terrorism, asserting the need to respect fundamental rights, and emphasising the importance of combating discrimination and promoting equality of opportunity, especially in education, training and employment. There are, however, two or three points in the report that I find dubious, notably the references to ‘moderate Islam’ and to ‘monitoring of all the locations where propaganda is being disseminated that aims at persuading people to commit terrorist acts’. Nonetheless, while I may be unable to give the report my wholehearted support, rejecting it would mean surrendering to the right and consigning months of effort to the waste bin. That is why the best course, in my view, is to abstain and to explain the reasons for doing so."@en1

Named graphs describing this resource:

The resource appears as object in 2 triples

Context graph