Local view for "http://purl.org/linkedpolitics/eu/plenary/2008-01-31-Speech-4-216"
Predicate | Value (sorted: default) |
---|---|
rdf:type | |
dcterms:Date | |
dcterms:Is Part Of | |
dcterms:Language | |
lpv:document identification number |
"en.20080131.22.4-216"2
|
lpv:hasSubsequent | |
lpv:speaker | |
lpv:spoken text |
"British Conservatives support the broad thrust of this own-initiative report – who could be against energy efficiency? However, we have reservations about certain aspects of the proposal where the rapporteur seems to have lost a sense of proportion.
Energy efficiency marking is good for enabling consumers to make a choice but to start proscribing particular products merely because they use energy in a way that some do not approve seems excessive.
It seems particularly unreasonable to pick on patio heaters (paragraph 16), which have become widespread as a direct consequence of the UK Government’s anti-smoking legislation.
We trust that this particular suggestion will not be incorporated into any future Commission proposal."@en1
|
lpv:spokenAs | |
lpv:unclassifiedMetadata |
Named graphs describing this resource:
The resource appears as object in 2 triples